
Kwame Nyame 64 wrote:Straight away Balck is asking about what is not truth.And Qlypse is talking about aspects of truth.This is the thing with truth.lt seems truth doesn't lend ltself to direct description or speculation.

thebalck1 wrote:Kwame Nyame 64 wrote:Straight away Balck is asking about what is not truth.And Qlypse is talking about aspects of truth.This is the thing with truth.lt seems truth doesn't lend ltself to direct description or speculation.
As humans I believe that we can view "the truth" as spherical. So depending on where u stand on the sphere "the truth" will be relative I guess there is nothing wrong with that -to each their own truth.
Question is WHO made the sphere?

Only opened minded people tread carefully or be cautious approaching such topics before opening their mouths. But others will quote you scriptures and call out past saviours and say full stop.Kwame Nyame 64 wrote:Straight away Balck is asking about what is not truth.And Qlypse is talking about aspects of truth.This is the thing with truth.lt seems truth doesn't lend ltself to direct description or speculation.



Kwame Nyame 64 wrote:Whatever it is;sphere or spectrum,l think the human instrument cannot encompass its entirety.
Would it be a safe argument then that truth cannot be defined;it can only be experienced.
And if the character and behaviour of those we call saints,avatars,saviours and enlightened are anything to go by,it seems more often than not words fails to convey what it is.
Still,we can still endulge here in all the mental acrobatics.
Kwame Nyame 64 wrote:
This reminds me of the story of a group of philosophers who sat in their chambers to debate the arrangement and the set of teeth an average horse has.A child overheard their long discussion and confronted them.
"Why don't you guys go out and grab a horse to count its teeth?" the boy asked?
Kwame Nyame 64 wrote:
Children are closer to truth they say.
Kwame Nyame 64 wrote:
l think the reason for this is because it is not about adding on but instead dropping stuff.
Kwame Nyame 64 wrote:
When we are stripped of everything we've learned and acquired during our existences here in the physical;when we are able to drop as it were everything shell,covering and outer bodies,what is left may like be truth.We may be looking for what we have always been;meaning a single step,a single opinion takes us away from truth.

quophi aletse wrote:good question kwame......
i see truth from two perspective....
in relativity truth can be many aspects to different people from
what resonates deeply with someone to
what someone agrees with or deems right to
what some external source says is true without any questioning or contemplation from the individual
etc etc
on the other side outside of time .... what is truth then ..... well im at a place where truth = existence on the other side at this moment ..... everything that exists is truth on the other side ..... that is my current understanding now



and what is 'The Truth'?kuro be so Hene wrote:
I don't agree. You see truth is like a binary equation. It has two states. Either it's present or it's not. Maybe kwame should have asked what is 'the truth' instead of just 'truth' alone.when we talk about 'the truth' we must agree that our perspectives can not alter 'the truth'.
kuro be so Hene wrote:The truth is what is, has been and will be. You see brothers all these things are one. What has been can be written down or told in many ways but there is only one version of what has been. In the same way that 'what is' can only be one and also 'what will' be is only one.
One universe? Where did you hear that from? Is that your truth? You just proved what the brother minister quophi said right (something you disagreed with). According to your truth there is one universe, right?kuro be so Hene wrote: There is one universe and that is the truth right?

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests